Movie Clips Of Misty Mundae

Water Management on "Are Together" (The Alternative des Lilas)

Water Management on "Is Set"
Private or public ownership?
to us to impose the right choice!

The type of management for the public service of water, "Is Package" is the first big case of the new urban community. Until then each municipality was adherent to SEDIF (Union waters of Ile de France). With the creation of "Is Set", the nine cities were transferred to the jurisdiction
intercommunal "water". Elected officials must take a position before the end of the year on the management mode. Two orientations are possible, continued private management with the nebula SEDIF / Veolia and a gradual return to public ownership.

This choice is highly political because it is a societal choice for nearly 400 000 citizens.

What SEDIF?

SEDIF manages the public service of drinking water for the of 133 communes in the Paris region.

historically managed by the Right, the President is 25 years since Andre Santini. SEDIF delegates the use of water for 85 years, Veolia through the larger (juicy?) Contract European water management.

Why out of SEDIF?

We believe that the profit target private companies such as Veolia is inconsistent with the reasonable use of common property and does not ensure fair pricing for the population. Water is a vital resource which is due out any logic of profit.

The difference in pricing between Paris and its suburbs is one illustration of this logic of profit:
- Paris, Public Governance € 2.96 / m3
- SEDIF, delegation to a private company: 4.17 € / m3

A study of the UFC Que Choisir, SEDIF his water bill "2.5 times more expensive than what it costs," with "a net margin of 59%"!

Another management solution exists

In France, local authorities have two options for water management, delegated management to a private company (eg SEDIF) or the direct management authority (Ex.Paris, Grenoble, ...). Contrary to popular belief, most communities still under state control. The choice of our elected officials is therefore crucial and will mirror the model of society they defend. Would there be a society where
public goods are privately managed or should a central place to public services?

A majority left to private management?

At our local action against the postal privatization, many organizations and political parties have spoken for the Protection of local public services. How not to hold the same positions on a subject that our elected officials have full mastery?

Despite our numerous inquiries from numerous elected officials including Mr Lagrange left Lilac positioning themselves for a delegation to SEDIF / Veolia (sic).
A return to public ownership is possible and the dynamics of Paris on this subject is to be taken as an example. For reasons unclear what would it otherwise lacking
"Are Together"?

We call on all people to actively participate in public meetings
on Water and take note of the decisions that elected officials take on this.

Water Management to "Are Together" for a return to public ownership
Meeting / Discussion at Lilac
Monday, September 13 at 20:30
Freedom Gymnasium, 30 Boulevard de la Liberté
Water Management
The urban community
"East Ensemble "Should:
1) Delegate to the private
2) Back to public ownership


Analysis Progress Report:
Choice of management of the public drinking water from East Ensemble with Jean
- Claude Oliva, President of the Coordination Water Ile-de-France with
Debate:
- Anne Le Start, president of Water
of Paris - Amard Gabriel, president of the community of Lakes of chipboard
Essonne - Dominique Voynet, Mayor of Montreuil
- Christian Lagrange, Vice President of East Ensemble Officer
Water - Daniel Bernard, Vice President Is Set delegate to the Town policy
- And the members of the collective
"For a public water management in East Ensemble

Pilar Cyst Tea Tree Oil

Meet Dominique Voynet on Water Is all

July 8, 2010 a delegation from the association for public management Water Is Set to met Dominique Voynet, Mayor of Montreuil.
Indeed the group has asked for several weeks of appointment to each of the mayors of nine cities in the urban community to know everyone's position on water management.


remember that before Ms. Voynet, only the mayor of Pantin we had fixed an appointment with his chief of staff to finally meet a delegate elected Lilacs, Mr. Lagrange. This meeting was also shown above the desire to continue with Lagrange SEDIF ...



With Mrs. Voynet, we shared most of our observation:

- management of water must be lifted from the clutches of private, including Veolia's newly reappointed by SEDIF,

- network maintenance, to prevent losses due to leakage, is insufficient, but not interested in making pay that Veolia Water

- Management SEDIF reveals a collusion between the clutches of the major parties (UMP, NC, PS and PC) and Veolia on the backs of users.

- the price of water is excessive on the perimeter of SEDIF.


We were able to share from the comments of Ms. Voynet in the press (the weekly Politis) where she said her criticism of SEDIF and even mentioned the possibility Montreuil to climb out of SEDIF.

The delegation of the group, several ideas are needed:
- must actually lead the great battle on this popular issue before the community board's decision (Petition, film, exhibitions, etc..)
- this battle is winnable: Is all of the elected are more likely to hear their constituents that delegates SEDIF,
- State of the feedback is very positive: people do not actually see why they would choose the most expensive the least environmentally friendly and less controllable ... if not for nefarious reasons.

It was agreed to continue discussions and reflection during the summer to prepare for the debate to be held in September after the final results of the study.

Recall that the collective public management of water is set is a network involving: Left otherwise Pré Saint-Gervais-agglo93 Alter, otherwise Bondy, Dominique Stephan Attia-Beltran-elected communist Murielle Bensaid Montreuil, Coordination of Water Ile de France, the Federation for Alternative Social and Ecological (FASE) Montreuil, the collective water-S-S, the Left Party, the alternatives of Les Lilas, Bagnolet- Pantin, Greens Montreuil.

Bib Overalls For Women

Community Council is set June 29, 2010 When

Not to say all politicians from East are very invested in the debate. The main point of the community council was adopting the rules. The debate was passionate, almost all elected officials spoke, the president has also accepted the amendments. It must be said that the preparation of this debate was not less democratic.
Go, stop dreaming: there were only 56 out of 91 present, the quorum being 46, it almost stalling ... But you did well not to come: no real debate, has was completed in thirty minutes.

1 - Removing Rating: 2010/06/29-01: Appointment of a representative of the Urban Community Is All in the conference health 93-1

2 - 2010/06/29- 02 2010/06/29-07: indemnity plan
Community Council at a meeting of 16 February and 18 May approved the creation of several positions. This is to establish the system of allowances will be applied. Adopted unanimously


3 - 2010/06/29-08: Membership of the Community of agglomeration Together is the group control for electronic communications services coordinated by the Syndicat Intercommunal the outskirts of Paris for electricity and communication networks (Sipperec)
This is to join the Sipperec to pass the market telephony and internet.
Adopted unanimously

6 - 2010/06/29-09: Approval of the perimeter of the Scheme Development and Water Management (ICCM) "Croult - Enghien - Old Sea" and appointment of a representative the urban community is set within the Commission Local Water (CLE)
Schemes of Arrangement and Water Management (SAGE) have been created by the Water Act of 1992 to reconcile economic development, land use and sustainable management of water resources. Its purpose is to develop a balanced management between the protection of aquatic ecosystems and human uses of satisfaction, to ensure sustainable social and economic development. It determines and prevent risks related to water.
Adopted unanimously

7 - 2010/06/29-10: Adoption of the draft rules of procedure Community
agglomeration Is Set
A document which boasts of many quality (democracy, transparency, etc.).

Marie-Genevieve Lentaigne , citizenship and Ecology Group, said that the group is organized co-presidency, that does not provide regulation.
Mariama Lescure (Alter-agglo93) challenges the composition of groups of 4 members. In the case of Alter-agglo93 (2 elected) or modem (1 elected), there will be no group. When we know the spin which has already led the establishment of the community council, there will be no more room for variety.
Mr. Peries, MRC , protested against the term civil society as different from themselves elected.
Kern jokes about our proposal, "to a group, it takes two," he offers agglo93 Alter-elected to a group of non-registered with MODEM!

we vote against every other vote FOR

8 - 2010/06/29-11: Creating a Community Investment Fund contest for 2010
To finance the construction or operation of a equipment, assistance funds may be paid between the urban community and municipalities.
following functions:
Bagnolet ................... € 836 954
Bobigny .................... € 1,238,299
Bondy ...................... € 1,523,671 Les Lilas
.................. € 527 796
Le Pré Saint Gervais ....... € 467 813
Montreuil .................. € 2,548,230
Noisy le Sec ............... € 1,027,038
Pantin ..................... € 1,205,200
Romainville ................ € 624 999
TOTAL ...................... € 10,000,000

9 - 2010/06/29-12: Vow of the Urban Community is set against the deletion of ticket moderator of the business tax

Adopted unanimously with 4 votes (UMP?)

Clothing Store Resume Cover Letter Examples

SEDIF Is all talk of

We publish the minutes of the meeting SEDIF because we see what all is threatened (by Cambon and Marseille of the UMP), cajoled (For Lice, PC) or encouraged by those seeking to break 88 years of fool's bargain with Veolia ...


SEDIF Proceedings of the June 24, 2010

The union of the waters of Ile-de-France was to meet at the House of Latin America in the heart of Paris, metro Solferino. The President of SEDIF, Santini, preferred back to Choisy.



On arriving there, we see a nice collection of big cars with roundels and drivers: our elected officials are there.


The meeting is open but not really because we had to settle for a replay on a TV screen ... Jean-Luc Touly, campaigning for a public utility and elected Regional Ecology in Europe, is angry: on screen , we can not see records that pass in the session. With others it takes the stairs to the meeting room of elected vigilantes rushed, but not enter: the elect are locked to protect them. Despite the noise retransmission will continue: we can speak without hesitation of a true majority of elected deaf to the demands of citizens. And we understand much better the device Santini and his lieutenants in choosing this room, away from the noise of the populace, that is to say citizens.


The Union Council of SEDIF comprising 133 communes in the Ile-de-France must approve the contract granting the water market to multinationals Veolia for 12 years. No other options available to elected officials present.

Christian Metairie wonders what a fool's bargain, a billing of 40 million being accepted by all. But Santini interrupt him and say, denied the mocking tone of recalcitrant elected. The big head Santini has lost everything, even ridicule.


Pascal Popelin actually involved in defending the procedure followed to arrive at Veolia. And feared being mistaken for a simpleton. For a naive, no, unfortunately. For him, everything was perfectly fulfilled. Contradict this praise, he says he wants a public utility and declares that the PS group would abstain rather than vote for. We will return.

After him, Gilles Poux, the PC will make the room laugh citizens stating that the procedure was sound and transparent and said that the CPF will vote elected a "positive abstention". Referring to all East, 9 cities whose outputs are SEDIF, he hoped that SEDIF found its 142 members, so the return of East SEDIF together. The PC is set to go there really rolling in the mud?



M. Cambon, 1st Vice-President of Santini and UMP senator, requires a clarification for the return of East SEDIF together. The tone is peremptory, you'd hear as subliminal message: "Coucouche poodle! "Addressed to the elect of the 9 cities in Seine Saint-Denis. But who says there will be back?


Benedict Bernard, Fontenay-sous-Bois is mandated to vote against it and demand a public vote, as is normal, so that his vote be known to all. He takes the example of the output is set as an evidence of failure SEDIF

Philippe Kaltenbach, Socialist Mayor of Clamart, and advocating for public ownership, facing all these shameful abstainers remember being told during the campaign to voters is to vote abstain indirectly for the winner. Perhaps it is the sense of abstaining each other. The elected


recalls said: "Veolia has eaten up for years." Besides the regional audit recommends a public rather than a public service delegation, because it is a procedure more challenging given the sums involved.

The same period of 12 years is unusual: a long delay is understandable if heavy investments to be amortized. This is not the case here.

Frédéric Zenou, elected MRC Kremlin-Bicetre, surprised in meeting some of his colleagues left to vote counter to their field. He too will vote against and demand a public vote.


Mr. Marseille, is vice president of UMP Santini. Here is the anthology. First he treats the public boards of old Stalinist regimes of Eastern European countries ... It shows all the finesse of his thought. He cites as an example of Lille town that holds the private, while it has just put the passage in governance. We will not know if it was ignorance or deception on his part. Then he mocked the way in public ownership of the city of Paris ...! Then the ridiculous peaked when he worries about the health of Parisians now private no longer distributes their water ... It will not be surprised if he wants to insist on "subscribe" to what is set on Cambon: "We need clarification before the return of all East. SEDIF English is not an inn! . All these gentlemen believe they have already killed the animal for being so demanding on the sharing of the spoils?


Jean-Pierre Pernot (no, not the journalist), Vice-President PS Santini, mayor of Mery-sur-Oise, fought tooth and nail the delegation to private. At least it is clear, finally, if you will.


Messaoudene Majid, elected Saint-Denis, campaigning for a public utility, responded to Mr. Marseille he is not aware of complaints from Parisians on their water since the municipality has passed into public ownership. Indeed!


An elected whose names have escaped (Delanoux?) Requests a secret ballot "to allow the serenity of the debates! The operation seems sewn with white thread: they had a formal request is made to allow elected officials to hide their vote to their constituents.

Jacques Mahéas, which we have already mentioned the name here for a severe sentence, Socialist Mayor of Neuilly-sur-Marne is not want "the debate is polluted by some stakeholders" (unedited!). But he had already illustrated in the defense and illustration of Santini during an inspection at SEDIF citizen. He also pretends to be naive in not understanding why the contract is so long, 12 years.

Karina Kellner, an elected PC Stains, which approves the "positive abstention" of lice, whereas the "progress" of the new contract, wants to "go further" she thinks to propose a wish soon on social tariffs, that is to say, a text that has a general value person and commits to nothing ... It is against this proposal "revolutionary" that closes the "debate"

Santini puts in the electoral vote. The thing had been planned: 38 are in favor of a public vote, 62 for a secret ballot ... We're not proud to SEDIF.


Then the contract with Veolia is approved as expected: on 125, 83 voted in favor, 20 voted against and 22 abstaining. The poor have been surprised that the failure to do officialis par with the opposition.


Politicians come under a barrage of false banknotes, Santini avoids a door hidden from public view. A buffet awaits. The contract is $ 3.7 billion over 12 years.


Reviewed by Vincent Duguet