affirm our position from the outset: that intermunicipal cooperation between cities and sharing. We are therefore fully consistent with our values cooperate to help develop, build / Sharing ideas with everyone in order to best meet needs, share power?
associations network Alter-agglo93, represented today by Dominic Attia (Montreuil) and I carry these ideas. We will defend them, here as elsewhere.
Many facts already show that we must be vigilant and we believe it is you who will be with us:
· Contrary to what has been said, municipal elections were not the occasion for a debate on the draft urban community, despite claims teams in place,
• It should have been based on the needs of the population to build intercommunal. In this sense, is all born in conditions that no anti-democratic "catch up" not
· It is as if the wishes of the elected majority passed before the needs of residents,
· Lack of projects developed by the people finds its justification in the fact that he left 2 years to find what we will do together ... 2 years? it's nothing, and you know,
• Finally we are outraged to see a nice idea plastered to considerations of shopkeepers that share of seats.
This is particularly unfortunate that the policy statement of the mayors spoke of the goal of developing innovative democratic practices. One would have imagined that the proportional part of it. However, the appointment of community representatives has reduced the opposition to a bare minimum. Thus, in some cities, Romainville example, nearly 50% of voters are not represented here.
This meeting is therefore an example of the cons-stated principles.
is a source of distrust for the people of the territory.
We also note that you are not achieved parity. It's still a renunciation so that all relevant municipal majorities proclaim their commitment to this principle. Installation
community council could be a defining moment for opposition to policies of social regression, injustice, that Sarkozy declines across our territory. Then he will cut even more in public services: education, health, transport, culture, degradation continues, it is time that we show our difference and answering questions posed by the communications staff interco.
We want to pool our ability to provide better service.
We want to share the wealth among the population.
We see this all the meaning of intercommunal. This is especially true for cities that share a territory such as the Canal de l'Ourcq or RN3, or have joint projects as SIPLARC (which provides meals for schools in Noisy-le-Sec and Bondy), or the Trianon cinema.
We continue to seek intermunicipal democratic and civic projects, a interco ecological and social facts and not in self-proclamation.
Examples of our approach, we will defend throughout our involvement: An approach
democratic citizenship:
ID that each inhabitant of the town, including foreigners, for voice,
• Who gives their place minority elected officials, and associations,
project: soliciting citizens on proposed projects by holding discussions in each city. To this end, we will provide a website which will feature local initiatives which we invite all cities to participate,
Ecological: all show our commitment forth by the choice of public management of water in direct control,
name: developing the quality of social housing, promoting access to culture for all with the same local tariff in the agglomerated for all cultural and sports facilities for example.
But let's not forget Haiti: the earthquake that struck the dramatic population makes necessary a vote of emergency assistance, and especially the construction of sustainable projects. We ask you, since it is too late now to put this item on the agenda of the next community council.
0 comments:
Post a Comment